elib
DLR-Header
DLR-Logo -> http://www.dlr.de
DLR Portal Home | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Contact | Deutsch
Fontsize: [-] Text [+]

Validation of transition modeling techniques for a simplified fuselage configuration

Krimmelbein, Normann and Krumbein, Andreas (2021) Validation of transition modeling techniques for a simplified fuselage configuration. Aerospace Science and Technology, 118. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107043. ISSN 1270-9638.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] PDF - Only accessible within DLR - Published version
21MB

Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963821005538?dgcid=author

Abstract

A Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solver has been equipped with two different transition prediction and modeling techniques for automatic transition prediction on general three-dimensional geometrical configurations. The first technique is a streamline-based approach that applies an automated local linear stability code, the eN-method and a simplified two-N-factor strategy and is applicable with any kind of turbulence model. The second technique is a transition transport equation approach and uses the γ-Ret,heta model. The standard γ-Reθ,t model has been extended by a modeling approach that captures transition due to crossflow instabilities. The extended model can be applied to three-dimensional configuration exhibiting crossflow transition whereas the original γ-Reθ,t model only captures streamwise transition mechanisms. The paper focuses on a three-dimensional inclined 6:1 prolate spheroid which can be considered as a simplified fuselage configuration. For a number of years this configuration has become a standard basic three-dimensional test case for transition prediction approaches and has been used in a number of international workshops and research activities. The focus of the paper is the validation of the two transition modeling approaches for six different angles of attack using two different turbulence models, a standard two-equation eddy-viscosity model and a differential Reynolds-stress model. The simulation results from the two approaches have been compared against each other and to the available experimental data. The comparisons highlight as many qualitative and quantitative similarities and agreements as they reveal quantitative differences and deviations of specific details.

Item URL in elib:https://elib.dlr.de/143664/
Document Type:Article
Title:Validation of transition modeling techniques for a simplified fuselage configuration
Authors:
AuthorsInstitution or Email of AuthorsAuthor's ORCID iD
Krimmelbein, Normannnormann.krimmelbein (at) dlr.deUNSPECIFIED
Krumbein, AndreasAndreas.Krumbein (at) dlr.dehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-7328
Date:19 August 2021
Journal or Publication Title:Aerospace Science and Technology
Refereed publication:Yes
Open Access:No
Gold Open Access:No
In SCOPUS:Yes
In ISI Web of Science:Yes
Volume:118
DOI :10.1016/j.ast.2021.107043
Publisher:Elsevier
Series Name:Elsevier (November 2021, 107043)
ISSN:1270-9638
Status:Published
Keywords:Transition modeling; eN-method; Unstructured RANS solver; Linear stability theory; 2-n factor strategy; γ-Re,theta extension for crossflow transition
HGF - Research field:Aeronautics, Space and Transport
HGF - Program:Aeronautics
HGF - Program Themes:Efficient Vehicle
DLR - Research area:Aeronautics
DLR - Program:L EV - Efficient Vehicle
DLR - Research theme (Project):L - Digital Technologies
Location: Braunschweig , Göttingen
Institutes and Institutions:Institute for Aerodynamics and Flow Technology > CASE, BS
Institute for Aerodynamics and Flow Technology > CASE, GO
Deposited By: Krimmelbein, Normann
Deposited On:29 Nov 2021 13:48
Last Modified:29 Nov 2021 13:48

Available Versions of this Item

  • Validation of transition modeling techniques for a simplified fuselage configuration. (deposited 29 Nov 2021 13:48) [Currently Displayed]

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Browse
Search
Help & Contact
Information
electronic library is running on EPrints 3.3.12
Copyright © 2008-2017 German Aerospace Center (DLR). All rights reserved.