Petzoldt, Tibor und Utesch, Fabian (2016) Trying to validate subjective reports with a naturalistic driving data - a case against questionnaires and surveys to quantify driver distraction. European Conference on Human Centered Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, 30. Juni - 01. Juli 2016, Loughborough, UK.
Es ist eine neuere Version dieses Eintrags verfügbar. |
PDF
38kB |
Offizielle URL: http://conference2016.humanist-vce.eu/Proceedings/Session-7.pdf
Kurzfassung
The effects of different forms of driver distraction on driving distracting activities, however, is less clear. Available are comparatively well understood. How often drivers actually engage in different methods are either not able to provide a complete picture, or are extremely expensive. Post-drive questionnaires and surveys might provide a cheap solution to the problem. As part of a naturalistic driving pilot survey/questionnaire that is intended to capture the occurrence and duration of different secondary tasks. However, for a variety of reasons, this attempt was unsuccessful. It became clear that there was a huge discrepancy between the drivers’ naïve understandings of secondary tasks (what is it, what is part of it, how long is it, etc.) and scientific definitions of the same concepts. Further problems arose from the fact that even though questioned directly after the trip, many accounts appeared to have been reconstructions, rather than recollections of secondary task engagement. We conclude that subjective accounts of secondary task engagement are largely inappropriate to quantify driver distraction.
elib-URL des Eintrags: | https://elib.dlr.de/125079/ | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dokumentart: | Konferenzbeitrag (Anderer) | ||||||||||||
Titel: | Trying to validate subjective reports with a naturalistic driving data - a case against questionnaires and surveys to quantify driver distraction | ||||||||||||
Autoren: |
| ||||||||||||
Datum: | 2016 | ||||||||||||
Referierte Publikation: | Ja | ||||||||||||
Open Access: | Ja | ||||||||||||
Gold Open Access: | Nein | ||||||||||||
In SCOPUS: | Nein | ||||||||||||
In ISI Web of Science: | Nein | ||||||||||||
Seitenbereich: | Seiten 208-218 | ||||||||||||
Name der Reihe: | Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems | ||||||||||||
Status: | veröffentlicht | ||||||||||||
Stichwörter: | Driver distraction | ||||||||||||
Veranstaltungstitel: | European Conference on Human Centered Design for Intelligent Transport Systems | ||||||||||||
Veranstaltungsort: | Loughborough, UK | ||||||||||||
Veranstaltungsart: | internationale Konferenz | ||||||||||||
Veranstaltungsdatum: | 30. Juni - 01. Juli 2016 | ||||||||||||
HGF - Forschungsbereich: | Luftfahrt, Raumfahrt und Verkehr | ||||||||||||
HGF - Programm: | Verkehr | ||||||||||||
HGF - Programmthema: | Bodengebundener Verkehr (alt) | ||||||||||||
DLR - Schwerpunkt: | Verkehr | ||||||||||||
DLR - Forschungsgebiet: | V BF - Bodengebundene Fahrzeuge | ||||||||||||
DLR - Teilgebiet (Projekt, Vorhaben): | V - Fahrzeugintelligenz (alt) | ||||||||||||
Standort: | Braunschweig | ||||||||||||
Institute & Einrichtungen: | Institut für Verkehrssystemtechnik > Human Factors | ||||||||||||
Hinterlegt von: | Utesch, Fabian | ||||||||||||
Hinterlegt am: | 28 Dez 2018 13:34 | ||||||||||||
Letzte Änderung: | 31 Jul 2019 20:23 |
Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags
-
Trying to validate subjective reports with a naturalistic driving data - a case against questionnaires and surveys to quantify driver distraction. (deposited 24 Okt 2016 10:36)
- Trying to validate subjective reports with a naturalistic driving data - a case against questionnaires and surveys to quantify driver distraction. (deposited 28 Dez 2018 13:34) [Gegenwärtig angezeigt]
- Trying to validate subjective reports with a naturalistic driving data - a case against questionnaires and surveys to quantify driver distraction. (deposited 19 Dez 2018 08:56)
Nur für Mitarbeiter des Archivs: Kontrollseite des Eintrags