DLR-Logo -> http://www.dlr.de
DLR Portal Home | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Contact | Deutsch
Fontsize: [-] Text [+]

Analysis of parabolic trough concentrator mirror shape accuracy in different measurement setups

Meiser, Siw and Lüpfert, Eckhard and Schiricke, Björn and Pitz-Paal, Robert (2014) Analysis of parabolic trough concentrator mirror shape accuracy in different measurement setups. Energy Procedia (49), pp. 2135-2144. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.226. ISSN 1876-6102.

[img] PDF (Analysis of parabolic trough concentrator mirror shape)


common measurement systems proving the high quality of state-of-the-art mirror panels. However, measurement results cannot always be compared directly because critical boundary conditions are not yet standardized. This paper quantifies the differences in shape accuracy results between the most common measurement setups for parabolic trough mirror panels and identifies measurement position, mounting mode and support frame employed for the measurement as relevant boundary conditions. Deflectometric measurements of mirror panels of RP3 geometry were performed at DLR’s QUARZ Center Cologne in vertical (mounting points vertically and curved direction horizontally aligned) and horizontal measurement position (mirrors facing upward with mounting points horizontally aligned), both with and without tightening the mirrors to a support frame with screws. Finite element models were applied to calculate gravity-induced deformation and resulting slope and focus deviation on three different types of support frame: an ideally rigid support frame, a laboratory support frame, and an ideal support frame with elastic brackets. The measurement results demonstrate that the difference in position and mounting mode can lead to relevant deviations of the shape accuracy results higher than the uncertainty of the employed deflectometric measurement system. For RP3 inner mirror panels a difference of up to 0.7 mrad in root mean square slope deviation (SDx) and 3.3 mm in root mean square focus deviation (FDx) from vertical to horizontal position was measured. Mirror shape specifications may thus not be applicable in all positions. Concerning the mounting onto different types of modeled support frame (in horizontal position) a variation of 0.5 mrad (SDx) and 1.8 mm (FDx) was calculated for perfectly shaped RP3 inner mirrors mounted onto an ideally rigid support frame compared to the case when mounted to a support frame with elastic brackets.

Item URL in elib:https://elib.dlr.de/91769/
Document Type:Article
Title:Analysis of parabolic trough concentrator mirror shape accuracy in different measurement setups
AuthorsInstitution or Email of AuthorsAuthor's ORCID iDORCID Put Code
Lüpfert, EckhardUNSPECIFIEDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6207-975XUNSPECIFIED
Schiricke, BjörnUNSPECIFIEDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0572-2048137346320
Pitz-Paal, RobertUNSPECIFIEDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3542-3391UNSPECIFIED
Journal or Publication Title:Energy Procedia
Refereed publication:Yes
Open Access:Yes
Gold Open Access:No
In ISI Web of Science:No
Page Range:pp. 2135-2144
Series Name:El Sevier
Keywords:parabolic trough; mirror; shape accuracy; quality control; optical measurement; deflectometry; finite element modeling
HGF - Research field:Energy
HGF - Program:Renewable Energies
HGF - Program Themes:Concentrating Solar Systems (old)
DLR - Research area:Energy
DLR - Program:E SF - Solar research
DLR - Research theme (Project):E - Qualification (old)
Location: Köln-Porz
Institutes and Institutions:Institute of Solar Research > Qualifizierung
Deposited By: Kruschinski, Anja
Deposited On:11 Nov 2014 13:31
Last Modified:29 Nov 2023 08:47

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Help & Contact
electronic library is running on EPrints 3.3.12
Website and database design: Copyright © German Aerospace Center (DLR). All rights reserved.