elib
DLR-Header
DLR-Logo -> http://www.dlr.de
DLR Portal Home | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Contact | Deutsch
Fontsize: [-] Text [+]

Benchmark of Experimental Determination Methods of Gas Permeabilities

Gascoin, Nicolas and Fau, Guillaume and Gillard, Philippe and Kuhn, Markus and Bouchez, Marc and Steelant, Johan (2011) Benchmark of Experimental Determination Methods of Gas Permeabilities. 17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 11.-14. Apr 2011, San Francisco, USA.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
441kB

Abstract

The thermal load protection of hypersonic and space vehicle structures can be achieved by either passive or active methods, such as ablative materials or active cooling. For the latter, porous Ceramic Matrix Composite media offer a possibility to exploit thermal protection by means of transpiration cooling due to their higher permeability. Ceramic materials used for regenerative cooling have a much smaller permeability (several orders of magnitude of difference). The cooling techniques based on fluid transpiration are particularly interesting for reusable systems. However, one of the related key issues is the determination of permeability parameters such as the Darcy's and Forchheimer's terms which are highly dependent on the fabrication process, cracks, delamination and heterogeneities notably. After a review of available permeation laws, the present paper aims at proposing an analytical and applied comparison of two of them (one based on the international norm ISO4022 and one derived for compressible flows). To apply these mathematically equivalent laws, a cross verification and validation has been realized on two different test rigs with different porous media (metallic and composite) with a range of Darcian permeability varying from 10E-17 m² to 10E-11 m². The PRISME test bench has a lower accuracy for thick samples (over 3 mm) due to lateral permeation while the DLR rig is free from such a phenomenon thanks to an innovative sealing (which is however not adapted to samples thinner than 3 mm). The two test rigs are found to be complementary since the PRISME one is more accurate for structures related to regenerative cooling (10E-13 m² and lower) while the DLR one is better for active cooling structures (10E-14 m² and higher). The range of permeability is very thin for cross verification but the results are nevertheless judged to be satisfactory (discrepancy around 14 % for reference samples). Finally, both methods for permeability determination are suitable and present discrepancies lower than a factor 2, which is still not negligible. However, this can be reduced to 50% by applying a DLR in-house code. The one based explicitly on compressibility is chosen more specifically for its easiest application to Computational Fluid Dynamics codes as it is based on the inlet conditions for the porous media instead of internal mean conditions with the ISO4022 method.

Item URL in elib:https://elib.dlr.de/69687/
Document Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Speech)
Additional Information:AIAA-2011-2252
Title:Benchmark of Experimental Determination Methods of Gas Permeabilities
Authors:
AuthorsInstitution or Email of AuthorsAuthors ORCID iD
Gascoin, NicolasUniversité d'Orléans, FranceUNSPECIFIED
Fau, GuillaumeUniversité d'Orléans, FranceUNSPECIFIED
Gillard, PhilippeUniversité d'Orléans, FranceUNSPECIFIED
Kuhn, Markusmarkus.kuhn (at) dlr.deUNSPECIFIED
Bouchez, MarcMBDA, FranceUNSPECIFIED
Steelant, JohanESA-ESTEC, The NetherlandsUNSPECIFIED
Date:12 April 2011
Refereed publication:Yes
Open Access:No
Gold Open Access:No
In SCOPUS:No
In ISI Web of Science:No
Status:Published
Keywords:Benchmark, CMC, Ceramic Matrix Composite, Fluid Transpiration, Permeability, Permeability Determination, Permeability Methods, Transpiration Cooling
Event Title:17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference
Event Location:San Francisco, USA
Event Type:international Conference
Event Dates:11.-14. Apr 2011
Organizer:American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
HGF - Research field:Aeronautics, Space and Transport (old)
HGF - Program:Space (old)
HGF - Program Themes:W RP - Raumtransport
DLR - Research area:Space
DLR - Program:W RP - Raumtransport
DLR - Research theme (Project):W - Rückkehrtechnologie - Innovativer Thermalschutz (old), W - Grundlagen Raumtransport - Innovativer Thermalschutz (old)
Location: Stuttgart
Institutes and Institutions:Institute of Structures and Design > Space Structural Components
Deposited By: Kuhn, Markus
Deposited On:15 Jun 2011 12:08
Last Modified:11 Jun 2015 10:58

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Browse
Search
Help & Contact
Information
electronic library is running on EPrints 3.3.12
Copyright © 2008-2017 German Aerospace Center (DLR). All rights reserved.