Karrell San Jose, Ira und Wiguna, Sesa und Wieland, Marc und Adriano, Bruno und Mas, Erick und Koshimura, Shunichi (2025) Comparative analysis of open-source SAR-based flood datasets for accurate flood extent delineation using deep learning. In: 2025 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 2025. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2025-08-03 - 2025-08-08, Brisbane, Australien.
Dieses Archiv kann nicht den Volltext zur Verfügung stellen.
Kurzfassung
Climate change has prominently modified the global hydrologic cycle in recent years, resulting to a constant
growth in frequency and severity of rainfall in various regions around the world. One of the cascading effects
of this phenomenon is the persistent rise in the mean sea level, increasing the likelihood of catastrophic floods
in low-lying areas. Extreme weather events, such as typhoons and sustained precipitation, not only exacerbate
flooding in coastal zones but also leave immense damage in urban areas. Therefore, precise flood extent
detection is crucial for the creation of effective early warning systems, disaster response, and recovery planning.
The identification of flooded areas used to be a labor-intensive and time-consuming task that requires human
expertise. With the application of Earth observation (EO) data using artificial intelligence, deep learning models
were developed to identify flooded areas from EO datasets of different modalities. However, the training process
in any deep learning architecture entails a large amount of labeled reference data to be fed into the network for
feature extraction. Among the datasets available for flood detection are optical images derived from drone
surveys (e.g., FloodNet) or satellite missions (e.g., SpaceNet). Although these datasets have fine
resolution suitable for defining flood boundaries, they are usually constrained by their reliance on optical
imagery and lack of geographical diversity due to limited spatial coverage.
In contrast, some flood datasets utilized synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images due to their ability to penetrate
clouds and operate under low light, which are typical conditions during a flood event. An example of which is
S1GFloods, a SAR-based dataset featuring flood events in different terrains under various flood-triggering
scenarios. This dataset accounted 46 flood events from 2015-2022 resulting to 5,360 Sentinel-1 image pairs. As
flood detection in built-up areas imposes greater challenge in the field of remote sensing, a more urban-focused
flood dataset was introduced namely the UrbanSARFloods. Similar to S1GFloods, this dataset utilized pre-
and post-event Sentinel-1 images, representing 18 flood events across the world. The dataset includes coherence
and intensity images derived from Sentinel-1 imagery. Training samples were semi-automatically annotated to
demarcate the boundaries between flooded urban and open areas and non-flooded regions.
Considering the advantages of using SAR images, extensive geographic coverage, and diversity in flood
scenarios, this study aims to evaluate and compare the reliability of SAR-based flood datasets, S1GFloods and
UrbanSARFloods, in accurately delineating flood extents in new topographic context. Each dataset was used to
independently train a convolutional neural network (CNN) model, keeping hyperparameters uniform across all
experiments. The analysis is focused on applying the trained models to a test site in Okayama Prefecture, Japan
that was severely devastated by Typhoon Prapiroon in 2018. Pre- and post-event SAR images and their
corresponding coherence images of the test site were collected and analyzed, ensuring that the data remained
unseen during training. Using ground truth data, performance metrics were determined to evaluate
the models’ accuracy in delineating flood extent.
Findings highlight the strengths and limitations of using SAR-based flood datasets for flood mapping. While
SAR images demonstrates good performance in extracting prominent flood features, the geographical
distribution of sample datasets remains crucial in applying the model to a different site. In conclusion, this
research emphasizes the importance of integrating multiple data sources for improved flood detection accuracy
and establishes a framework for leveraging CNN in flood mapping applications. Future work will include the
use of multimodal datasets covering wider geographic span and explore its applicability to other flooding
scenarios with diverse topographical characteristics.
| elib-URL des Eintrags: | https://elib.dlr.de/220114/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dokumentart: | Konferenzbeitrag (Vortrag) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Titel: | Comparative analysis of open-source SAR-based flood datasets for accurate flood extent delineation using deep learning | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Autoren: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Datum: | 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Erschienen in: | 2025 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Referierte Publikation: | Nein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Open Access: | Nein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gold Open Access: | Nein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In SCOPUS: | Nein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In ISI Web of Science: | Nein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Status: | veröffentlicht | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stichwörter: | Flood; SAR; deep learning; rapid mapping | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Veranstaltungstitel: | IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Veranstaltungsort: | Brisbane, Australien | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Veranstaltungsart: | internationale Konferenz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Veranstaltungsbeginn: | 3 August 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Veranstaltungsende: | 8 August 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HGF - Forschungsbereich: | Luftfahrt, Raumfahrt und Verkehr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HGF - Programm: | Raumfahrt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HGF - Programmthema: | Erdbeobachtung | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DLR - Schwerpunkt: | Raumfahrt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DLR - Forschungsgebiet: | R EO - Erdbeobachtung | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DLR - Teilgebiet (Projekt, Vorhaben): | R - Fernerkundung u. Geoforschung | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Standort: | Oberpfaffenhofen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Institute & Einrichtungen: | Deutsches Fernerkundungsdatenzentrum > Georisiken und zivile Sicherheit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hinterlegt von: | Wieland, Dr Marc | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hinterlegt am: | 09 Dez 2025 10:03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Letzte Änderung: | 09 Dez 2025 10:03 |
Nur für Mitarbeiter des Archivs: Kontrollseite des Eintrags