elib
DLR-Header
DLR-Logo -> http://www.dlr.de
DLR Portal Home | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Contact | Deutsch
Fontsize: [-] Text [+]

What determines the acceptance of socially optimal traffic coordination?: A scenario-based examination in Germany

Koller, Florian (2021) What determines the acceptance of socially optimal traffic coordination?: A scenario-based examination in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 149, pp. 62-75. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.04.004. ISSN 0965-8564.

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.04.004

Abstract

Social optimization emerged as a strategy for the attainment of more efficient road traffic (i.e., minimal total or average travel time). In order to achieve efficiency benefits, collective action is needed. A major challenge is that not every individual benefits equally from social optimization. Thus, a corresponding technological implementation (i.e., a social optimizing traveler information system (SOTIS)) is prone to rejection. The question remains as to which factors underlie the acceptance of such a system. Therefore a sample of 391 car drivers in Germany, stratified by kilometers driven per year, age and gender, completed a scenario-based questionnaire addressing attitudinal acceptance of a SOTIS. The results indicate that participants reacted rather hesitantly towards incorporating a SOTIS into daily driving. Indeed, structural equation modeling revealed that the behavioral intention to use it was promoted by its perceived usefulness. However, this intention was negatively affected by elicited subjective ambivalence (i.e., simultaneous conducive and opposing affect towards the SOTIS). Opposition in subjective ambivalence could be explained by perceived injustice. Social factors (i.e., a social norm and image gains due to using the system) were positively associated with perceived usefulness. The high social dependency and the effect for perceived injustice were not replicated in a second sample of 111 drivers that evaluated a user-optimizing traveler information system (UOTIS). The results suggest to taking active ambivalence reduction through transparent prevention of injustice, and the promotion of a conducive social norm into account in the planning and design of a SOTIS. Additionally, this study provides an empirically tested framework for examining the emergence and maintenance of acceptance of such a system.

Item URL in elib:https://elib.dlr.de/147086/
Document Type:Article
Title:What determines the acceptance of socially optimal traffic coordination?: A scenario-based examination in Germany
Authors:
AuthorsInstitution or Email of AuthorsAuthor's ORCID iD
Koller, FlorianFlorian.Koller (at) dlr.dehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2420-8995
Date:July 2021
Journal or Publication Title:Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Refereed publication:Yes
Open Access:No
Gold Open Access:No
In SCOPUS:Yes
In ISI Web of Science:Yes
Volume:149
DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2021.04.004
Page Range:pp. 62-75
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0965-8564
Status:Published
Keywords:Cooperative intelligent transportation Information system Social dilemma Social influence Subjective ambivalence Fairness
HGF - Research field:Aeronautics, Space and Transport
HGF - Program:Transport
HGF - Program Themes:Transport System
DLR - Research area:Transport
DLR - Program:V VS - Verkehrssystem
DLR - Research theme (Project):V - Energie und Verkehr
Location: Berlin-Adlershof
Institutes and Institutions:Institute of Transport Research > Passenger Transport
Deposited By: Koller, Dr. Florian
Deposited On:09 Dec 2021 12:33
Last Modified:09 Dec 2021 12:33

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Browse
Search
Help & Contact
Information
electronic library is running on EPrints 3.3.12
Website and database design: Copyright © German Aerospace Center (DLR). All rights reserved.