Adisorn, T. und Tholen, L. und Thema, J. und Luetkehaus, H. und Braungardt, S. und Hüneke, Katja und Schumacher, K. (2020) Towards a More Realistic Cost-Benefits Analysis - Attempting to Integrate Transaction Costs and Energy Efficiency Services. Energies, 14 (1), Seite 152. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/en14010152. ISSN 1996-1073.
PDF
- Verlagsversion (veröffentlichte Fassung)
908kB |
Offizielle URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/152
Kurzfassung
In order to calculate the financial return of energy efficiency measures, a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a proven tool for investors. Generally, however, most CBAs for investors have a narrow focus, which is - simply speaking - on investment costs compared with energy cost savings over the life span of the investment. This only provides part of the full picture. Ideally, a comprehensive or extended CBA would take additional benefits as well as additional costs into account. The objective of this paper is to reflect upon integrating into a CBA two important cost components: transaction costs and energy efficiency Services - and how they interact. Even though this concept has not been carried out to the knowledge of the authors, we even go a step further to try to apply this idea. In so doing, we carried out a meta-analysis on relevant literature and existing data and interviewed a limited number of energy experts with comprehensive experience in carrying out energy services. Even though data is hardly available, we succeeded in constructing three real-world cases and applied an extended CBA making use of information gathered on transaction costs and energy services costs. We were able to show that, despite these additional cost components, the energy efficiency measures are economically viable. Quantitative data was not available on how energy services reduce transaction costs; more information on this aspect could render our results even more positive. Even though empirical and conceptual research must intensify efforts to design an even more comprehensive CBA, these first-of-its-kind findings can counterargue those that believe energy efficiency is not worth it (in monetary terms) due to transaction costs or energy services costs. In fact, this is good news for energy efficiency and for those that seek to make use of our findings to argue in favor of taking up energy efficiency investments in businesses.
elib-URL des Eintrags: | https://elib.dlr.de/140497/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dokumentart: | Zeitschriftenbeitrag | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zusätzliche Informationen: | We kindly thank the Federal Energy Efficiency Center (BfEE) for funding the research project, which provides the basis for this publication. Thanks also to Arne Meier from the Wuppertal Institute for supporting this paper administratively. The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders of the research (BfEE) contributed to the design of the study through feedback and comments. In addition, the BfEE provided data from previously executed market research and evaluations. The funding agency agreed to the publishing of study results. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Titel: | Towards a More Realistic Cost-Benefits Analysis - Attempting to Integrate Transaction Costs and Energy Efficiency Services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autoren: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Datum: | 30 Dezember 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Erschienen in: | Energies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referierte Publikation: | Ja | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access: | Ja | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold Open Access: | Ja | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In SCOPUS: | Ja | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In ISI Web of Science: | Ja | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Band: | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | 10.3390/en14010152 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seitenbereich: | Seite 152 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verlag: | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN: | 1996-1073 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status: | veröffentlicht | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stichwörter: | cost–benefit analysis; energy services; transaction costs; energy efficiency; energy efficiency gap | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HGF - Forschungsbereich: | Energie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HGF - Programm: | TIG Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HGF - Programmthema: | Erneuerbare Energie- und Materialressourcen für eine nachhaltige Zukunft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DLR - Schwerpunkt: | Energie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DLR - Forschungsgebiet: | E SY - Energiesystemanalyse | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DLR - Teilgebiet (Projekt, Vorhaben): | E - Systemanalyse und Technikbewertung (alt) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standort: | Oldenburg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Institute & Einrichtungen: | Institut für Vernetzte Energiesysteme | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hinterlegt von: | Pade, Christian | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hinterlegt am: | 15 Jan 2021 16:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Letzte Änderung: | 15 Jan 2021 16:00 |
Nur für Mitarbeiter des Archivs: Kontrollseite des Eintrags