Standardization of New Airborne Multipath Models

Kurzfassung

In aeronautical navigation the use of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) is becoming ever more important. GNSS are one of the cornerstones of the performance based navigation (PBN) concept. They are currently used for navigation en-route, as well as during arrival procedures and for lateral approach guidance. Together with satellite-based or ground-based augmentation systems (SBAS, GBAS) satellite navigation can provide precision approach guidance down to CAT-I minima. In order to ensure sufficient global availability of these services and enable new services, such as Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM) for providing services with higher performance levels, including in regions with active ionospheric conditions, existing integrity concepts and augmentation systems are upgraded to incorporate not only GPS but multiple GNSS constellations and also navigation signals on a second frequency. On the side of GNSS, all GPS satellites since the Block IIF generation with currently 12 operational satellites provide signals in the L5 band (in addition to the most commonly used signals in the L1 band), a second frequency band usable for aeronautical applications. The Galileo constellation has currently 22 operational satellites in orbit that all provide signals on the E1 and E5a frequency bands. Other constellations, such as Glonass and BeiDou are also launching further satellites so that a large number of navigation satellites are available to users. The use of dual-frequency and multi constellation techniques will mitigate the impact of most ionosphere-related disturbances, significantly increasing service availability. All GNSS-based navigation methods have in common that they need appropriate integrity concepts safely bounding any residual errors that may prevail in the position solution. With the ionospheric errors largely addressed by dual-frequency and multi-constellation methods, the residual noise and multipath becomes the most significant contributor to the residual errors. In order to bound these errors, standardized error models are used. The existing multipath model was developed based on extensive data analysis, however, using only the legacy GPS signal in the L1 band. Galileo is using a different modulation for the E1 signals which is less susceptible to multipath. The GPS and Galileo signals in the L5/E5a band are using a 10-times higher chipping rate than the L1/E1 signal. Therefore, also for these signals, the multipath envelope is significantly smaller, potentially allowing to have smaller error models for these signals. When using dual-frequency methods to remove the ionospheric delay, the receiver tracking noise and multipath error from the signals on both frequencies are combined. For all these cases the existing model is not well suited for error modelling. Within the frame of the DUFMAN project funded by the European Commission new multipath models for the new signals are developed in order to be able to exploit the potential benefits for aviation users. Previous papers on the project were addressing the methodology, described the results of the studies and the influence of the antenna. This paper explains the standardization activities and discusses choices that were made in setting up the data collection campaign and the subsequent steps to standardized models. Regarding standardization, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is producing Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPS) for DFMC SBAS which will make use of the DFMC multipath models. Further requirements on the hardware exist e.g. in form of Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) that specify performance of certain components, such as the airborne antenna. A variety of antennas differing significantly in performance is available on the market. Furthermore, the airborne receiver hardware may use different correlator spacing and receiver bandwidth settings which may also have an impact on the results. In the effort to characterize the multipath errors, hardware and processing choices had to be made taking into account all those requirements and the impact on the final models. The paper discusses the interdependency between different standards and explains the choices that were made in the project, as well as results in terms of standardization.