Gibb, Duncan und Johnson, Maike und Romani, Joaquim und Gasia, Jaume und Cabeza, Luisa F. und Seitz, Antje (2018) Process integration of thermal energy storage systems: Evaluation methodology and case studies. Applied Energy, 230, Seiten 750-760. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.001. ISSN 0306-2619.
PDF
746kB |
Offizielle URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918313023
Kurzfassung
As a key tool for decarbonization, thermal energy storage systems integrated into processes can address issues related to energy efficiency and process flexibility, improve utilization of renewable energy resources and thus reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, integration of these systems is dominated by the variety of potential processes in which the storage technologies can be deployed as well as the various benefits they deliver. Therefore, the requirements for thermal energy storage systems vary greatly depending on the chosen application, just as the systems themselves have different capabilities depending on their technical principles. This paper addresses this issue by developing a systematic methodology that approaches the challenge of characterizing and evaluating thermal energy storage systems in different applications in three concrete steps. To begin, a set of guidelines for process analysis has been created to disclose process requirements for storage integration. The methodology continues by explicitly defining the system boundary of a thermal energy storage system, as well as addressing technical and economic parameters. Finally, the approach concludes by determining the benefit of an integrated thermal energy storage system to an application and examines how key performance indicators vary based on the perspectives of different stakeholders. Within this work, the methodology is then applied to two case studies of high-temperature storage in concentrating solar power and cogeneration plants. Also introduced are the concepts of retrofit and greenfield applications, which are used to clarify differences between integrated storage systems. The paper shows how such a systematic approach can be used to consistently analyse processes for storage integration, facilitate comparison between thermal energy storage systems integrated into processes across applications and finally grasp how different interests perceive the benefits of the integrated storage system. This type of systematic methodology for technology integration has not been previously developed and as such, is a novel and important contribution to the thermal energy storage community. In the long term, this work builds the basis for a discussion on benefits of thermal energy storage system integration with diverse stakeholders including storage system designers, process owners and policy makers.
elib-URL des Eintrags: | https://elib.dlr.de/121555/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dokumentart: | Zeitschriftenbeitrag | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Titel: | Process integration of thermal energy storage systems: Evaluation methodology and case studies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autoren: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Datum: | 15 November 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Erschienen in: | Applied Energy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referierte Publikation: | Ja | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access: | Ja | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold Open Access: | Nein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In SCOPUS: | Ja | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In ISI Web of Science: | Ja | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Band: | 230 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seitenbereich: | Seiten 750-760 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verlag: | Elsevier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN: | 0306-2619 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status: | veröffentlicht | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stichwörter: | Thermal Energy Storage (TES); Technology assessment; Process Integration; Process analysis; System boundary; Key Performance Indicators (KPI) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HGF - Forschungsbereich: | Energie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HGF - Programm: | Speicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HGF - Programmthema: | Thermische Energiespeicher | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DLR - Schwerpunkt: | Energie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DLR - Forschungsgebiet: | E SP - Energiespeicher | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DLR - Teilgebiet (Projekt, Vorhaben): | E - Thermochemische Prozesse (Speicher) (alt) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standort: | Stuttgart | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Institute & Einrichtungen: | Institut für Technische Thermodynamik > Thermische Prozesstechnik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hinterlegt von: | Gibb, Duncan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hinterlegt am: | 07 Sep 2018 14:11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Letzte Änderung: | 02 Nov 2023 09:38 |
Nur für Mitarbeiter des Archivs: Kontrollseite des Eintrags