A Comparison of Two Multiple Access Schemes for Satellite Networks with Error-Prone Transmission Channels.
Böttcher, A. and Dippold, M. (1990) A Comparison of Two Multiple Access Schemes for Satellite Networks with Error-Prone Transmission Channels. Space Communications and Broadcastings (1990), pp. 333-343.
Full text not available from this repository.
Abstract
Transmission errors due to multiple path propagation and signal shadowing degrade the performance of various channel access methods. The performance of two typical access schemes from different classes is compared: Slotted Aloha and a demand assignment technique (DAMA). Slotted Aloha degrades slower than DAMA due to the capture effect.
| Document Type: | Article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additional Information: | LIDO-Berichtsjahr=1990, pages=11, | ||||||
| Title: | A Comparison of Two Multiple Access Schemes for Satellite Networks with Error-Prone Transmission Channels. | ||||||
| Authors: |
| ||||||
| Date: | 1990 | ||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Space Communications and Broadcastings (1990) | ||||||
| Refereed publication: | Yes | ||||||
| In ISI Web of Science: | Yes | ||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 333-343 | ||||||
| Status: | Published | ||||||
| HGF - Research field: | UNSPECIFIED | ||||||
| HGF - Program: | no assignment | ||||||
| HGF - Program Themes: | no assignment | ||||||
| DLR - Research area: | UNSPECIFIED | ||||||
| DLR - Program: | no assignment | ||||||
| DLR - Research theme (Project): | UNSPECIFIED | ||||||
| Location: | Oberpfaffenhofen | ||||||
| Institutes and Institutions: | Institute of Communication and Navigation > Institut für Nachrichtentechnik | ||||||
| Deposited By: | elib DLR-Beauftragter | ||||||
| Deposited On: | 02 Apr 2006 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 27 Apr 2009 09:11 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page